The
enterprise IT environment is continuing to see significant changes. An
organization's network monitoring software solution needs to be capable of
supporting long term requirements, whether it is growth within the volume of
monitored elements, new custom applications/devices that have to be monitored,
or different make use of models. If you are in the middle of considering an
upgrade out of your open-source or point checking tools, or replacing a good
inflexible legacy solution, make certain whatever solution you tend to be
evaluating is scalable, open and extensible to ensure it is future-proof.
A
vital limitation of traditional network management systems may be the existence
of a centralized data source for processing of overall performance data. Even
if the assortment of data is managed through distributed components, the
solutions invariably require centralization from the data for processing as
well as alert generation. For big infrastructures, this introduces a
substantial performance bottleneck. The multiplier effect of the quantity of
data that should be processed as new products are added is huge.
Capturing
and processing these metrics in one centralized database will put immense
pressure about the overall application, creating a substantial bottleneck. A
key consideration inside a replacement solution is be it based on a distributed
architecture that doesn't have centralized database bottlenecks. For instance,
some solutions will possess both distributed collection capability along with a
distributed database architecture. Within these solutions, individual data
gathering components typically have small local databases that can process tens
of a large number of metrics every few minutes to create alarms as needed, as
well as store the data in your area for multiple years. Monitoring consoles
receive notifications because they occur, and are in a position to retrieve
performance data through these separate databases when required for analysis
and reporting. No sophisticated database climbing or specialized database
administration expertise is needed for these systems.
A next
generation system performance monitoring software system also offers to support
different points of integration with respect to the stage of the support
management lifecycle, whether this be configuration of products and tests,
establishing person privileges, capturing performance information from custom
applications/systems, starting actions/notifications in external ticketing
techniques, or displaying performance information on external portals. In
several modern data center conditions, the monitoring software needs to be
capable of accepting overall performance data feeds from customized
applications. This could likewise incorporate processing syslogs and occasion
logs generated by programs. Certain events generated through the network
monitoring system may need initiating an action or process in certain external
system (e. grams. ticketing).
All of
these requirements have to be supported via flexible, open APIs and plug-in
frameworks inside the monitoring system. Make sure your alternative solution
exposes a rich group of two-way APIs and open up extensibility for integrating
along with existing systems or technologies. The API and external feeds have to
provide interface points in order to either import or export data through the
IT environment. Ensure how the API supports standard technologies, such as Web
Providers, Java, Perl and D, and allows provisioning as well as updating users,
devices as well as tests (see solution example).
To sum
up, comprehensive monitoring functionality within and of itself isn't
sufficient. You need to make certain that whatever solution you select adheres
towards the basic architecture tenants associated with scalability,
availability, openness, flexibility and extensibility (see complete listing of
key requirements). It is really a dynamic IT environment close to us. Make sure
your system monitoring software system will keep up as you move ahead.
Techsourcenetwork